|
|
Posted by Kathryn 8 Comments
|
|
8 Comments
|
|
|
what the hell? why would they write such a bad review–this person must be on something because in no way can Zac be an “annoyance”…he always plays his roles to a tee and with perfection. wait it seems that’s his characters attitude, maybe he is suppose to be that way for his role, it is acting and sometimes you have to act as a bad person for a role for which zac had gotten that role. we all know that Zac is a nice guy but it seems to me that through the article his character is that bad way not him. I’m with Dave; the comment doesn’t seem aimed at Zac on a personal level or on an acting level but is a relfection of his character – who the critic finds annoying. Based on what Zac’s character is supposed to be like, I’d find him annoying as heck too. (-: I dunno-maybe they were referring to his character like you said,but just the way they worded it saying one actor acted well, another was “actorish” and Zac was an “annoyance” seemed to me like they were taking a punch at Zac’s and the other actors’ acting capabilities…… Why thank you, FRUITFLY, its a good feeling when someone agress with me online over an important issue. They were not taking jabs at zac just explaining his character. I don’t think this was a “bad” critique of Liberal Arts, but this is like the only review that had anything remotely bad to say about the movie or Zac’s character. Leave a comment
|
|














Why are you posting the ONLY negative review of Liberal Arts and of Zac? Every other review is more positive and everyone else loves Zac, EXCEPT THIS review. That doesn’t make any sense to post on a Zac fansite, imo.